This would indeed not be a problem with so it framework; Sir John de Keith d

Re: ? Comyn wife regarding Malise

In regards to the Comyn child who was spouse out-of Malise of Strathearn, I got theorized inside the 2005 you to she had been Margaret, identified as wife out-of Sir John de Keith (look for backup of post below) who was simply 2ndly age are given because post: the newest spouse Emma I will suggest are of some other nearest and dearest, rather than mommy of the 2nd Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sub _Comyn, Earl away from Buchan_ , states in part, ‘Malise, Earl from Strathearn, had a wife Emma, when you look at the 1261-1267, whose surname try unknown ‘[SP II:256, cites Cal. regarding Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. some time in advance of 1270, so as that his widow (Margaret) would have been “available” a while shortly after Emma.

This is of course a conjecture; it can have the advantageous asset of dealing with a well-known relationship anywhere between Muriel Keith and you can Reginald le Cheyne. More relevant records would needless to say feel acceptance.

The new membership in the Scots Peerage about the category of Keith says from Sir John de Keith (d. california. 1270) which he was believed to keeps hitched Comyn, earl regarding Buchan . That it identity, of your own unsure (“believed to was in fact”) range, is now able to be corrected based on the following dispensation, old at the Fondi toward fourteen Jan 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, fifty Toward bishop out-of Moray. Professors in order to dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you can Murielle, damselle, d de Keth, off Moray and Aberdeen dioceses, on obstacle to help you relationships arising from the third and you will next amounts of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step one. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, zero. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the long run 2nd partner off Robert Stewart, initially Duke out-of Albany (d. 1420), try developed in order to wed Reginald ce Cheyne, child from Sir Reginald ce Cheyne by the his spouse (since their very first spouse), Helen off Strathearn. If you’re discover recognized gaps in the origins away from Muriel Keith, she and you can Reginald ce Cheyne manage display a lineage about Comyns. Although not, this is certainly too faraway to need an effective dispensation if the Muriel was a beneficial-great-high grandd Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan (d. 1233), which may be the instance if ‘s the reason daughter.

dos. Reginald ce Cheyne is actually a beneficial-grandson of Marjory Comyn, daughter out-of Alexander Comyn, Earl from Buchan (d. 1290), son of William Comyn listed above. Their own young buck is Malise, Earl from Strathearn away from 1312 so you’re able to their passing from inside the 1328 , and you may grandfather off Reginald.

ca. 1270), are same as Marjory Comyn, and partnered 2ndly to help you Malise, Earl from Strathearn (d. 1312). This would imply new parentage a€?believed to have been’ that Margaret, partner out-of Sir John de Keith, is from one age group: she would not have already been this new d Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan, but alternatively out-of his son Alexander. There is no facts one to Earl Malise and you can Marjory Comyn was partnered far just before 1275: since Lindsay authored,

There can be one to discernable base on which the partnership ranging from Reginald ce Cheyne and you may Muriel Keith will have stayed: if the Margaret Comyn, partner off Sir John de- Keith (d

‘ The fresh new spouse on the earl meet american women, regarding the 1275, is actually titled Marjory, as we see the attesting clause from Zero. curriculum vitae., which will be said because of the Wyntoun, Guide VIII. chap. vi., for started the next aunt out of John Comyn, Earl off Buchan, whom discussed on the part of Earl Malise the wedding settlement significantly more than said [dated during the London, April 26, 1293 having their child Matilda and you may Robert de- Tony, young buck out of Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de- Quincy Elizabeth out-of Buchan We __________________I________________ I III step one) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith I (als I Age regarding Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) I d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I We We We We We Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de Keith E off = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de- Tony I ______I_______________________ I We I We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- E away from Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 We ce Cheyne We I We = 2) Sir David We V We We de Graham Sir William de We We__________ Keith We I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ I I I III We We We I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke from Albany)